There are many reasons why parents may consider obtaining guardianship for a young adult or child with I/DD, but parents also are frequently unaware that guardianship results in the loss of all of a person’s legal and civil rights. This is why alternatives to guardianship are so important.
Supported decision-making is becoming a well-recognized alternative to guardianship. Supported decision‐making allows persons with I/DD to choose trusted others, often family members, to support them in making their own decisions. Supports may include gathering information, helping persons with I/DD evaluate the information and understand the consequences of a decision, communicating decisions to third parties and supporting persons with I/DD in taking responsibility for their decisions.
Often the arrangement will be reduced to writing in a contract called a “supported decision‐making agreement.” Some institutions, like schools, may agree to accept such agreements instead of guardianship as, for example, is the case in Washington, DC. Some states, like Texas and Delaware, now have laws requiring private third parties (like doctors, financial institutions, or landlords) to accept supported decision‐making agreements. While New York does not yet have such a law, SDMNY hopes to develop evidence that will support legislation, regulations, and policies that will make supported decision-making a more readily available alternative to guardianship in the future.